Thermoforming Versus Injection MoldingMany parts that are currently being injection molded could also be thermoformed.

Thermoforming is a preferred solution in many cases, such as when

  • parts are large
  • short lead time is required
  • unsure of the viability of the product, or unsure of sales volume
  • likely that design will change
  • need to minimize start-up costs

The following table provides some points to consider.

  Injection Thermoform
Ideal volume:
1,000 and up (varies by part characteristics) up to 10,000 (varies by part characteristics)
Minimum lot size:
1,000 10
Lead time:
20 weeks and up as little as 1 week
Tooling costs:
$25,000 - $100,000 $500 and up, depending on material
Mold construction:
Steel - 2 (or more) parts Various composites, aluminum, or sometimes wood - usually one part, sometimes two
Amortization of tooling:
over 1,000 - 100,000 parts. If sales do not meet projections, there could be a substantial loss, as tooling costs cannot be recovered over 100 - 5,000 parts. Lower volumes needed to recover tooling investment.
Design changes:
steel tooling requires longer turnaround, and changes could require new tooling, at substantial cost composite or aluminum tooling is quickly reworked, and lower tooling costs mean less financial risk
Part size:
Large parts can have prohibitively expensive tooling and unit costs Ideal for large parts
Appearance:
Ejection marks, gate marks, porosity can be an issue One surface of plastic is completely untouched (for one-part mold), and thus generally has no defects. Surface in contact with mold offers excellent detail, based on mold. The application will determine which is the finished side.

For assistance in making a decision, give our sales or engineering staff a call!